Sunday, May 22, 2011

2000 Mercedes Benz Slk320

2000 Mercedes Benz Slk320. %IMG_DESC_1%
  • %IMG_DESC_1%



  • Nord
    May 4, 01:58 AM
    Good so.
    It's the return of the Mac, Steve Jobs said it so, so let's focus on Macs now and iPhone in second plan for this year at least; it's already a huge success, so...





    2000 Mercedes Benz Slk320. %IMG_DESC_2%
  • %IMG_DESC_2%



  • bman1209
    Mar 31, 11:01 AM
    I hope like Address Book, you can change it back.

    I haven't heard Address Book will be able to switch back, could you provide a link where you heard that?

    Thanks.





    2000 Mercedes Benz Slk320. %IMG_DESC_3%
  • %IMG_DESC_3%



  • odedia
    Jul 10, 01:46 PM
    Maybe they'll even offer ground-breaking features like bi-directional text editing :rolleyes:

    Seriously, if Apple wants to compete in the word processing field, they need to start addressing people around the world, not just those who they consider guranteed target audience.





    2000 Mercedes Benz Slk320. %IMG_DESC_4%
  • %IMG_DESC_4%



  • louis Fashion
    Apr 22, 10:32 AM
    4G is not here yet. Wait for it.





    2000 Mercedes Benz Slk320. %IMG_DESC_5%
  • %IMG_DESC_5%



  • macrumormonger
    Apr 12, 12:09 AM
    Currently on ebay as I'm about to part with it. :( What a beautiful lens.

    http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5103/5611212257_8cf1d39515_b.jpg


    Camera Canon EOS REBEL T2i
    Exposure 0.02 sec (1/50)
    Aperture f/4.0
    Focal Length 27 mm
    ISO Speed 2000





    2000 Mercedes Benz Slk320. %IMG_DESC_6%
  • %IMG_DESC_6%



  • Super Dave
    Jul 10, 01:37 PM
    WYSIWYG Font Menu!

    David:cool:





    2000 Mercedes Benz Slk320. %IMG_DESC_7%
  • %IMG_DESC_7%



  • twoodcc
    Nov 5, 05:22 PM
    Both computers now up-and-running. No complaints from the designers regarding poor performance :)

    I'm running the standard client, I'll look into the other options when I got some spare time.

    It's quite remarkable to see the performance boost compared to my G5 dual 1.8 that's been folding for years.

    glad to hear it. just so you know, the bigadv units will get you some big time points. it really is worth it if the machine is fast enough, and i'm pretty sure those are





    2000 Mercedes Benz Slk320. %IMG_DESC_8%
  • %IMG_DESC_8%



  • md111
    Apr 22, 12:13 PM
    We design stuff for S. Interiors and other properties. In the meetings, S starts out by saying ... "We would like to be like Apple. Here are photos of Apple stores" Even there ads and posters are similar once Apple kicked off there ads.
    Not to stereo type, but they are excellent copiers. Not to strong on original ideas. And they also work there ass's off. Its war to them to win at all costs.





    2000 Mercedes Benz Slk320. %IMG_DESC_9%
  • %IMG_DESC_9%



  • obeygiant
    Nov 1, 07:55 AM
    my xmas wish list:

    1.http://www.shuttersniped.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/-81382804703326990.jpg


    Canon 200mm f/2?

    Me too.





    2000 Mercedes Benz Slk320. %IMG_DESC_10%
  • %IMG_DESC_10%



  • rayz
    Aug 1, 12:20 AM
    He was talking about seeing blue screens. So it doesn't matter how many people would register it as a crash....they still wouldn't see a blue screen. That was the point he was trying to make.

    Yep. I got that; I was saying that the reason you don't see it is not because they've hidden it; it's because XP is actually a lot more stable. Crashes these days are pretty rare, and are usually caused by attempts to access strange areas of memory, or driver problems. I have an XP box running a couple of web containers, and a few app servers; aside from a driver hiccup, never had a crash or secret reboot (and I would know, because I would still need to log back in when I got back from the water cooler).

    Also, just as a side note...it took them three years to create the version you're talking about. I'm not stating this for argument—it's only here as additional info.

    ... and it took Apple just as long to create a stable version of OSX; the only real difference was that MS didn't charge for the interim versions. Again, just additional info.





    2000 Mercedes Benz Slk320. %IMG_DESC_11%
  • %IMG_DESC_11%



  • obey908
    Sep 15, 05:46 AM
    http://www.washingtonian.com/page_dbimages/9463/georgetowncupcake.sisters.png
    1 Chocolate birthday, 2 chocolate pb swirl, 2 pumpkin spice, 1 red velvet, and 1 vanilla/chocolate. Picking them up tomorrow





    2000 Mercedes Benz Slk320. %IMG_DESC_12%
  • %IMG_DESC_12%



  • Queso
    Jul 21, 10:18 AM
    Finally Apple are back from those awful tanking sales G4 years, though will they ever break through that 5% glass ceiling?





    2000 Mercedes Benz Slk320. %IMG_DESC_13%
  • %IMG_DESC_13%



  • Snowy_River
    Dec 1, 07:19 PM
    I hope you understand what exactly you are saying. Under 10% is still Millions of systems. Included in that small percentage are hundreds if not thousands of businesses, thousands of schools, and many home businesses. Like anything in life, there are people that like the easy stuff, the work that effects the most people, or the work that provides the most challenge.

    Worldwide impact is likely motivation for some hackers, however it doesn't include all of them!


    Yes. This is part of why the low market share argument always seemed a bit weak. One can argue that there is a threshold beyond which a platform starts getting more attention from malware writers, but to argue that OS X had a small enough market share such that NO malware writers were trying to write a virus, trojan, worm, adware or spyware has just never made sense.





    2000 Mercedes Benz Slk320. %IMG_DESC_14%
  • %IMG_DESC_14%



  • iEvolution
    Apr 29, 07:49 PM
    But this is how the true Apple believer thinks. If Apple doesn't make it, you don't need it. If anyone else makes it, it's junk. All that matters is that Apple makes huge sums of money so we can brag about it here. We want to pay a high price so Apple can continue to produce products that we want to buy and we don't want any competition. All we care about it what Steve says.

    That's your choice man and I respect it, we all have our own ways.





    2000 Mercedes Benz Slk320. %IMG_DESC_15%
  • %IMG_DESC_15%



  • jeffedsell
    Apr 13, 02:19 PM
    Another vote in the no column. It just doesn't fit with what Apple does, and where they are right now. As has been noted above, this would be a new market for Apple, and they don't jump into new markets without something that's going to overwhelm their competition and make them instant leaders. A TV set with a baked-in AppleTV isn't it.

    I could see the AppleTV continue to evolve, perhaps adding apps or somesuch. But I think even that will wait. Put simply, the streaming video market is an unholy mess right now. Apple won't take a swing unless they feel they can put one over the fence.





    2000 Mercedes Benz Slk320. %IMG_DESC_16%
  • %IMG_DESC_16%



  • Macinthetosh
    Apr 22, 04:19 PM
    what would the ppi be if the screen was made to 3.7 inches? still are sharp as the current display?

    Since this rumor suggests it would maintain the current resolution, it would not be as sharp. The difference would likely be unnoticeable, however.





    2000 Mercedes Benz Slk320. %IMG_DESC_17%
  • %IMG_DESC_17%



  • MacVibe
    Apr 13, 07:28 PM
    Right on schedule!





    2000 Mercedes Benz Slk320. %IMG_DESC_18%
  • %IMG_DESC_18%



  • Raptura
    Apr 22, 04:24 PM
    I would be really disappointed to see a metal backing like iPod Touch has. My previous iPods from the past are so jacked up on the backside with scratches and dents. I know I'm not alone with this.

    I'd prefer if the iPhone retained a glass backing like on the iPhone 4; I think it's just so sexy. But if they were going to move to metal I'd prefer an iPad-style backing.





    2000 Mercedes Benz Slk320. %IMG_DESC_19%
  • %IMG_DESC_19%



  • Luman
    Apr 29, 02:52 PM
    I haven't bought a single song from Amazon, not because I'm against them (I luv my Prime membership), but because they only sell MP3's that simply don't sound as good as an AAC file at an equivalent bit rate. Dropping the price to 69 cents doesn't improve the quality of the product and that's not good enough for me.

    Viva la FLAC! Viva la Apple Lossless! Viva la.. um... AAC! :D





    Kelmon
    Oct 24, 08:00 AM
    Will buy the 17" version just as soon as the store will take my order...

    Anyway, at least this wait is now over!





    infernohellion
    Apr 16, 11:37 PM
    I have a really strange problem changing the background wallpaper. Every time my computer goes to sleep the old background will be back again. However, this can be solved with a simple Shut Down before going to sleep.





    smiddlehurst
    May 3, 08:37 AM
    And yet prices in the Australian Apple Store are still 25% higher than the USA Store. How rude, Apple.

    Top end 27" iMac = US$1999, or in the Australian Store, AUD$2299 which at the current exchange rate is about US$2500. Why should we pay more, Apple? If anything, we're closer to China so should pay less on shipping!

    Whilst it's slightly better than yesterdays prices, I'm still seriously not happy.
    I'd buy one if we got the USA prices.

    *sigh* Every time someone makes this mistake...

    Bear in mind that the US prices do not include sales tax of any kind. In your case Australian prices include GST which I believe currently runs at 10%? If you're anything like the UK there may be additional import taxes to pay and the cost of doing business is likely to be higher (everything from shipping costs to salaries affect the price you pay at the checkout). Add in a margain that Apple will calculate to protect themselves from changes in the exchange rate and you'll probably be very close to price parity. Just as in the UK you're paying extra for the product because of the country, not because of Apple.

    That's not to say Apple DON'T screw up on exchange rates and gouge the heck out of us non-Americans of course. The Mac Mini being the most recent, and painful, example. But you need to make sure you compare like for like before complaining.





    fcortese
    Apr 14, 08:28 AM
    http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5301/5618374236_ba21c7581e_b.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/ryan_tir/5618374236/)
    Pure Wonder and Fascination (http://www.flickr.com/photos/ryan_tir/5618374236/) - What I wouldn't give to see with her eyes again.

    Love this photo, but then again as a father of four daughters I'm a sucker for this kind of picture!





    AndyR
    Nov 6, 02:16 AM
    No I've been waiting for VM to get their butt in gear to launch Workstation. Parallels was simply a work around, a crappy one at that, until I could get VMWare. There is simply no way in heck I'm spending $80 on a piece of software that can crash my system. And before someone tells me to use Bootcamp. Yah right. Advanced Power Management does not work right under Bootcamp even with the latest version. When Parallels starts making a product that
    1. Doesn't crash\freeze my system
    2. Doesn't require me to force quite the application once every couple of weeks because the progress bar when I'm suspending a session has stalled.
    3. Doesn't have sharing between folders that takes a good 5 seconds to parse the files and doesn't drop a file mapping in your file explorer.
    4. Doesn't have the world's crappiest networking passthrough. I can't count how many times I've gone from one network to another to another and had it get confused telling me I might have limited network connectivity. So I need to repair the connection.

    Parallels sucks but until now its been the only REAL game in town. Boo hoo I'm not paying for an app that IMHO is half baked to begin with. :rolleyes: At least I'm not outright going in search of a seral number and pirating the thing. Again its a tide me over until VM gets their butt in gear and releases this thing.

    Dude, your doing something totally wrong. I've got Parallels running a 1.83ghz , 1gb MacBook and its pretty much instant at everything! Never hung on me every, suspending takes only a few seconds, likewise from resume. Sharing of files is instant, well no differenace than working on it nativly.

    I have XP SP2, Office Sage, Visio, Project, Money and Autoroute all running and never have any probs.

    Your doing somat wrong mate.



    No comments:

    Post a Comment